Language, is often said, to be a tool; a tool, it is believed, to be, one, used for, communication. And while, in many ways, languages, are often, presented, as being, rather, cultural, they can, also be, very much, programmable tools, that induce, human motion. Human motion, is of relative, importance, to some, as it is, an area of study, often relegated, to so called, primitive cultures, and never, really seen, for what it is: a kind of language.
And while, like most, languages, human motion, can be used, as a, communications tool, human motion [in its static form e.g. stances, poses and the likes], can be used, as a symbol, of power itself. Language, as a form, of power, is not, often, associated, with expressivity itself, but with, symbols, of all sorts. Human motion, in its, symbolic form, as a communicator, of power, is often, associated, with what, they call, Primordial Symbols; symbols, often believed, to have been used, to create, the universe itself [the ability, to embody, these symbols, and express them, can very well, make one, similar, to the universal mind].
Traditionally though, the development, of Language, and Human motion itself, have often, contrasted, and differed, in a rather, interesting manner. Language itself, has often, developed, with regards, to what, they call, Signs [signs seen, and the attempt, to explain them]. These Signs, were often, in the form, of, emblems, emblematic, and insignia. Greek, as a language for instance, developed, via, the study, of ancient Signs [coming from Egypt], and the attempt, to explain, and very much, express, what they meant [emotions aroused] [the Egyptians, were rather advanced, in the study, of Signs]. Human motion, on the otherhand, while associated, with Language development, has also, very much, had a history, of its own [as with regards, to its development], and often, associated, with what, one could call, Sacred Languages [like Khoisan speech]. In many ways, this occurred, in the form, of, identifying, with a Primordial Symbol [attempting to embody it], and on doing so [usually, via expression, such as Dance], one would learn, how to express themselves, in a new way, and manner, resulting very much too, in a change of speech [Dances, such as those, associated, with Shiva, embody, Primordial Symbols, and belong to, Sacred Dance].
While the study, of Signs [emblems, emblematic and insignia], led, to the development, of Language [not only via, attempting to express them], but also, very much, in understanding, the principles, thoughts and practises, that these Signs, embodied, in themselves, and also, very much, expressed, via, the Human motion, induced. In all, while Language, is often, believed, at its heart, to be, structurally based, on the Noun-Verb construct, in reality, ancient Languages [more advanced than modern], were structurally based, on expressing, thoughts, principles, and practises. We too have though, what they call, Colloquial Languages, which are Languages, that arise, from the main study, of Human motion [as via Primordial Symbols], and being influenced, to speak, as one moves. Primordial Symbols, and Human motion, differ, in general, from motion, inspired, by Signs, in that, the Human motion, inspired [by Primordial Symbols], is problem solving, by nature; The fight scene, at the beginning, of the Musketeer movie, is one, of, Primordial Symbols, and their making, one act, in a way, to bring about, Balance, of all sorts. In many ways really, it is, Colloquial Languages, that are based, on, Noun-Verb constructs.
Language and Identity:
Language, in many ways, has often, been used, to forment, an Identity [of any kind], and especially, Group Identity. This, in many ways, is rather, problematic, and confusing, in nature, as it limits, the usage [and development], of Language itself, and fails, to understand, that, Language, is our primary tool, used, in helping us, evolve, into higher beings [they do not speak, English, in the heavens]. To make something confusing, rather clearer, is to attempt, to understand, the general, downfall, of man, from an evolving being, into, a hominidal one.
We can, in general, divide, the human, into, two, prime identities: Individual and Group. We can say too, that, Language, is used, to help us, evolve, with regards, to these, two identities. These two identities, are not, as simple, in description, as many believe them, to be; What this means, is that, most, believe them, to be, associated, with people [and one interactions with them]. This is not so, but was so, in the beginnings, of civilization.
In later periods, of civilization [going back, to the Ancient Egyptian times], Individual, and Group identities, were formented, in different ways, and as follows: Individual identity [with Signs and Primordial Symbols], and Group Identity [with Feminine law, Law, Art and Theosophy]. In general, the modern way, of creating, Identity, based on, Language, is very backwards, and people, since, the Egyptian times, have identified, with Signs & Symbols, and Group Identities, based on Art, Law etc., with Language, used simply, as a tool [of evolution] and communicator. In France, at one time, it was not, whether, you spoke, French, or not, it was, whether, you were, Baroque, or not.
In the world today though, while Language, is used, as an identifier [and Identity], with regards, to the Individual, the Group Identity, has taken, an even, bigger beating, with man made tools, being used, to replace, language, as a communicator [what this means, is that, most groups today, are not, held together, by a common language, but, by the tools, they use] [most human interactions today, are tool based]. The use, of tools, to forment, Group Identities, has very much, led, to a heavily, mechanized world. In past times, tools, had evolved, to the point, that, they were dictated, by, Feminine Law, Law, Art, and the likes. It is a strange world [of basic tools], we live in, tools, mainly used, for the purpose, of, ensuring survival [and not thought systems, or intelligence].
In todays world really, Individual Identity, while being, defined, by Language, is in most ways, created, by Body shapes & forms, and an accompanying, personal materiality. The study, of Body shapes & forms, has always, been, controversial, due to the, basic belief [very olden, and true, for ancient times], that all body shapes & forms, were the same in origin, and there was, very much, an ideal. In truth though, to really understand, body shapes & forms, is to understand, head shapes [for different kinds, of body shapes & forms, emanate, from different types, of head shapes] [in all, superiority, between, two different beings, is based, on their having, the same, head shape, and comparing, their body shapes & forms]. There are about, three, basic, head shapes [narrow, wide, and heart], and each, signifies, different things. Narrow head shapes, signifies, greater abilities, with regards, to, ones, evolutionary being; wide head shapes, mean, in general, one is more, religious/moral, by nature. Heart shaped heads, mean, in general, that one, is more, intelligent, by nature. What makes, any of them, superior, to the other [even within, the same group], is in, their having [and being], oval, in shape. In general, oval shaped heads [wide, narrow and heart, in scope], are superior, to those, that lack, any oval like influence [with regards especially, to the Godly being (the seat of creativity)]. You also, very much, have, the issue, of Negroid, and Caucasoid features, which are based, on the worship, of different, Deity beings i.e. deities and gods [Godheads]. People, with Caucasoid features, have often, worshiped, Deities, while those, with Negroid features, have often, worshiped, what they call, Godheads [e.g. being the Sphinx and the Meso-American gods (Olmec heads)]. Those who worshiped, the Godheads, lived, in general, more religious lives, while those, who worshiped, Deities, lived, secular lives. In general too, Godheads, are more, generally intelligent, than Deities, with regards, to basic intelligence [the ability, to generally understand, and grasp things, by nature]. Deities too, tend to have, specific intelligences, while Godheads, have greater abilities, with regards, to having, perspectives, points of view, and, objectivity.
Group Identities, today, on the otherhand, are more, or less, based, on regional identities [and associated tools]. Identities, such as, European, North American, African, Asian etc., are Identities, that are heavily, tool based [and survival based too], and generally state, that those, who identify, with such identities, tend, to use, certain tools, and in general, survive, in a certain manner. These, are the main, Group Identities, most have, and all others, are actually, based, on them.
Traditionally, the development, of Individual, and Group Identities, differed, as slightly explained, above. Individual Identities, for those, evolving, via Languages [and Signs and worshiping Deities too], were based, in many ways, on, Sporting Identities. One sees, the formation of this, mainly, in Ancient Greece, where, various, 'Olympic sports', such as, Javelin, and Discus throwing, were at the heart, of, forming, Individual Identities. Most 'Olympic Sports', are heavily, Sign based, with especial regards, to poses, and stances. Those who mainly, studied, Human motion [in forming Individual Identities & based, on Primordial Signs, and the worship, of Godheads], created individuals, mainly based, on, Sacred Dance [such as that, of Shiva].
Group Identities, as mentioned before, had evolved, to greater heights, and based on, Art [in past times]. Group Identity, is rather important, in nature, as it is the basis, of understanding, oneself, with regards, to history. What this means, is that, if one, has defects, based on, historical evolution, then, these defects, are not, really, individual, but group, in nature and form. In previous periods, Group evolution, as based, on, Art or Law, for instance, occurred, through, what they call, for example, Dynasties [as in the case, of the Egyptian Dynasties]. What these Dynasties meant, is that, they practised, a certain, form, of Law or Art. In many ways, Group Identity evolution, has regressed, to a rather, low level today, based on, basic survival tools [machines too], and their evolution. Understanding, Group Identity, is of prime importance, as many people, believing themselves, related, are not, really so [genetically speaking]. It is, for example known, that, Egyptians, and Nubians, differ/differed, genetically. The Egyptian-Nubian world, has given birth, to many, Art worlds: Egyptian, Greek, Ancient Spain, Celtic/Latin, Middle Eastern (Nubian-Phoenician), Nubian (Meroitic) and European. What is falsely assumed, is that, these worlds, are rather, much, the same, or similar, and all having, a basic root, in Egypt [this is not so]. The Egyptian world, including, all forms, of, Egyptian intelligence, only existed, in three worlds: Egypt, Celtic/Latin and Greece. The other worlds, said, to stem, from Egypt, actually, stemmed, from Nubia [in short, they are of, Nubian origins, and have no, relation, to Ancient Egypt (lower Egypt)] [the Nubian world here, is made up of, Upper Egypt, and Nubia itself]. Nubia, as a civilization, only did ever, equal, Egypt (lower Egypt), during the times, of, Akhenaten [and even earlier]. Many of these, more civilized, Nubians, actually became, a part, of the, Greek world. Why this is stated, is for many out there, to know, that, there has existed, a divide [genetic even], between, the Egyptian, and Nubian worlds, and that, what, most consider, to be, the Glories, of Ancient Egypt, were only, really associated, with Lower Egypt [and not, the Nubian world]. In general speech, a Mesopotamian, who was part, of the, Egyptian world, is much similar [in nature], to a descendant, of, Lower Egypt, than a Nubian is. The Nubian world, has proved, to be rather, problematic, and what, most consider, to be, of Beauty [even in America], of the Egyptian civilization, came, via, the Lower Egyptians [and Celtics/Latins]. The two most disturbing, of these worlds [Nubian], have been, Ancient Spain, and European. It is they, who have created, alot, and much, of the chaos, people see, in the world, today. America, has a part, ugly history, born, of, Ancient Spain. Theres, is a world [in the negative], heavily based, on defining, others, as being inferior, or superior, based on, elements, of hate really. A world, filled with, all sorts, of racial slurs [e.g. Coons, Niggers, Nigs, Oreos, Jambalayah, Cracker, Chinaman, Chinks, Hymie, Bean......], and many others, you probably, have never heard of. A world, in many ways, filled, with all kinds, of violence, and also, very much, associated, with the Spanish, speaking world. While the world, of Ancient Spain, has in many ways, had, unorganized violence, it is in, the European world, where, organized violence, becomes, common. Theirs too, is an ugly world, of all kinds, of, systematic like, forms, of discrimination [slavery, oppression, imperialism, colonialism, police brutality, racism, massacres/genocides, holocausts, wars, intolerance....], and all other such forms, of systematic based, violence. In short, what is been said here, is that, all that (above), is Nubia, and not, Egypt [what is been furthermore claimed here, is that, Egyptians (lower Egypt), are more or less, incapable, of such behaviour]. Why this is mentioned, is so that, for many, out there, to better gain, a better understanding, of the Western world, and America, specifically [as a Land of Beauty and Ugliness]. Those people out there, wishing, to develop, should realize, that their hopes, will never come true, via, attempting, to engage, the European, and Ancient Spain, worlds. They are worlds, filled, with all kinds, of hate [some genetic based]. The Europeans, in general, hate everyone, who is not, European. The Ancient Spain world [and even Spanish speaking], hate, brownskinned individuals, the most. For those, wishing, to develop, engaging, the Egyptian world, is the way, to go [as via, the Middle East] [they have the knowledge, the money, and Oil, comes with the package too] (in many ways, the Saudi Riyal, makes, for a better, world currency, than the dollar). In analyzing, the Western world, and other peoples, around the world, it is best, to analyze them [as a global community], based on, the Art worlds, that influenced them [and not continents] [India for instance, is home, to different, Egyptian-Nubian peoples; you have people, associated, with Ancient Egypt (Lower Egypt), Middle Eastern, and Nubian (Meroitic)] [Not all Indians, from Egypt-Nubia, are the same]. In all, what is been said, is that, most problems out there, are due, to the descendants, of, Ancient Nubia itself [minus some (dynasties really e.g. 12th and 18th)], and those also, strongly influenced, by this world [Ancient Nubia]. In many ways, it is the direct descandants, of the Nubian world, that are, the main problem here; Ray Stevenson, might be, of the European world, but he still is, very much, a Roman [in many ways, the very heights, of European Art, was attained, by the Romans, and not, the Europeans themselves]. The most ugliest too [in display really], of the Egyptian-Nubian worlds, has been, the Nubian (Meroitic) world. It has been, in many ways, a world, of poor Art, and all forms, of, disturbing violence [one is most likely, to be elbowed, and even gored, into, ones eye, while dancing, to Nubian music]. The Nubian world, is backwards, with regards, to, mainstream events [but looks progressive, since it is, very much, still, Art based, rather than, basic survival tools, tool based]. Nubian Art, gives rise, to, poor, and disturbing, mainstream events e.g. blindings, arm and foot amputations (via accidents of all sorts), poor timing, violent street fights, unplanned for pregnancies, and the likes. All mainstream events, that can, very much, become, part of your life, if you listen to, and dance to, Nubian music [it in general, influences, your behaviour, and movements, and one is likely, to have, an accident, from such, induced movements]. Beauty, in the Western world, really arises, from the, Celtic/Latin world [Celtica], which has, Egyptian, but mainly, Greek, elements [Johnny Depp (Egyptian), Alicia Silverstone (Egyptian), and William too (Greek)]. In all, as mentioned before, it is, Group history, that in many ways, defines, whom you are, as a Person, and how, you generally feel, about yourself (as a Person). [Hopefully, the Nubian (Meroitic) world, will be replaced, by, Niger Art, as it is a world {Nubian}, of never ending, problems, and as mentioned, very poor, mainstream events. No technology or science, can really resolve, the problems, of the, Nubian (Meroitic), world. For a good example, of the Niger World/Art, mainstream events, check out, the works, of Ugandan writer, Barbara Kimenye (Uganda, was once, culturally influenced, by Nigeria)] [Technological ingenuity, coming from, Nigeria, does not belong, to the Nubian world, but to the, Niger world] [Hopefully too, the European world, can be saved, by replacing its Art, with, Magick][even France, which is believed, to be, the center point, of European civilization, was not, fully, European, and had a, big, Egyptian element, to it (major figures, such as Dumas, worshiped, Godheads/the Sphinx)]. In all though, one should know, that, while, Ancient Egypt (Lower Egypt), was mainly Brown, it did have, Black, and Whites, in it; Nubia, on the otherhand, was mainly always, White and Black [the Egyptian Priesthood, which consisted, of, luminary figures, such as, Imhotep, also worshiped, Godheads/theSphinx].
Language & Evolution:
When talk, of Language, often erupts, it often, focuses, on which, is the best, and even, which, is superior, to others. In many ways, this talk, often, focuses, on grammar, and even, vocabulary [and sounds], issues. In many ways, knowing, which language, is superior, to another, is very much, based, on seeing, languages, from the perspective, of, adverbial descriptors; descriptors, which consists, of words, such as, tell, say, mention, state, announce, and the likes. Such words, and their various tenses too, such as, told, saying, mentioningly, and all the likes. These descriptors, in many ways, show, in just how, many ways, one, can speak, or say things. Whenever, one says, anything, in a language, they are basically, either, telling, saying, mentioning, stating [and all the likes], something. What makes, one language, superior, to any other, is how, many, of these, spoken states, it has, in comparison, to another language.
Most people today, simply, say things; spoken states, such as, mention, or state, are unknown, to most, out there. Even announce, is not, used, anymore [people simply, say things, even, when it appears, something great, has happened] [the world, is at a low, not conceived, since, the beginnings, of speech, as with regards, to the use, of only, say, in all forms, of speech, and writing, today] [Animal speech, also, often uses, say].
English, is often, considered, to be, a superior language, to others, when the truth is, that, the great minds, of Europe, were always, of, French, Italian and German origins. English, as a language, is great, for social evolution, and is only, superior, with regards, to, description [generally describing things]. One of the more, superior languages, out there, is Swahili [with regards, to spoken states]. Even French [old French], does not rise, to the level, of Swahili, with regards, to the heights, of spoken states [the known, greatest height, being, state]. It is possible, with Swahili, to hold, all kinds, of conversations, just simply, by, stating (state) things [not saying, mentioning, or even, telling]. Conversation, at the state level, is very much, ingenious, in nature [all this, refers, to Swahili, as spoken, by, the Swahili, and not, Kenyans, Ugandans or Tanzanians]. One should also know, that there are more, of these, spoken states, than those, labeled, using, only one word. While you have, spoken states, such as, tell, told, telling, or even, mention, you can also have, sayingly-tell, mentioningly-say, announcingly-mention, mentionably-announce, and even probably, sayingly-tell-say [the limits, of language, are pretty much, unknown].
Accessing, all possible, forms, of spoken states, allows one, to reveal, the ends, and limits, of the universe itself. Each of these states, is held really, by a logical structure [grammar], mainly consisting of, principles, thoughts, and practises. Which logical structure [that is, mainly, principles or practises], is of importance, depends, on how, one chooses, to live; in Africa for instance, one will find, that, while, many would believe, that principles, are of, great importance, one really finds, that, practises, are of more, importance. In Africa, survival, is really, by practises; what this means really, is that, for example, instead, of planning, ones day, by time [and space really], it is better, to plan it, by, clock [and appropriateness]. What this means, is that, in Africa for instance, one will find, that, doing certain things [including shopping for instance], is easier, at certain, time periods [with regards, to energy and feeling states], than at, others. Thats what practises, are mainly about [energy consumption], and that, doing certain things, at, a certain time period, is [feels], much easier, than at, other, time periods. In Africa, doing things, at 4 p.m., requires, less energy, than at, other, times [practise]. Also mentionable, even if, a language, is at, the say, level [as in sayingly], it can, still, develop, a considerable [and even interesting], culture, of its own. Old English, was at, the mention level, but the culture, created, was never, as interesting, as the culture, created, by Celtic/Latin Americanistas, based on, an American English, at the say level [sayingly]. Celtic/Latin Americanistas, once created, a most, interesting culture, of all kinds, based on, mainly, having, sayingly, spoken states. One of the offshoots, of this, culture, was an, amorous, love culture, based on, being, 'sayingly'. A culture, that was able, for instance, to deal, with colour differences, within them, by talking, in a sayingly, manner [the so believed, European culture, of dividing, white women for instance, by hair colour e.g. blonde, redhead, and brunette, is of, Celtic/Latin Americanista, origin]. An interesting culture, in that, it divided, people, by colour [in a sayingly manner], while making, everything, humane, in nature; And from this culture, developed, a love culture, that kind of, made, American women, rather popular, everywhere [the love culture, whereby, one returns, to their hotel, after, a hard days work, or even, after, a rock concert, and decides, to walk, into, a bar, wherein, they meet, the most, beautiful woman [often blonde], who decides, to engage them, in a, conversation, sayingly] [In such scenarios, anything, can happen, when things, are been said, sayingly (Am just saying......)]. One can also see, in many ways, how, the Art world, is never ending, in limits [with regards, to scope and nature], as a piece, of music, or a painting too, can be played/painted, in a, say, sayingly, tell, tellingly, mention, tellingly-say, manner [American Art, has in many ways (despite being interesting), only been, at, the tell level].
Language & Urban Planning:
Language, in many ways, when spoken, is often, really associated, with, intention, motive, and aim. Those three too, also, in many ways, are at the heart, of, human motion, itself. All this, is the basis, of, city and urban planning too [that there, is a language element, to it all]. Nearly all, urban and city planning, has to do, with, human intention, motive, and aim. Todays cities though, are heavily, not based, on the person (as they should be), but on, the car. Cars, in many ways, not only, define, how cities, are built [and urban planning in itself], but also, in many ways, define, human intention, aim, and motive. What is been said, is that, the walking being, has different aims, intentions, and motives, than the, driving being; and also that, the very act, of driving, eventually, has one, being driven, by certain intentions, aims, and motives. A complicated world, but not too, difficult, to see, for those, who have lived, in both worlds [as a walking being, and driving being].
What makes, urban planning [and city too], interesting, is that, peoples intentions, aims, and motives, can be thought out, in different, spoken states [tell, say, telling etc.]. In short, one finds then, that a community, whereby, peoples intentions, are driven, by, saying, results, in different cities [and urban planning], than communities, where, peoples intentions, are driven, by, mentioning. Paris, for instance, is a greater city, than London, in that, its a city, where, peoples intentions, have historically, been driven, by, mentioning [London, on the otherhand, has been, an announce city] [in many ways, intention, aim, and motive, pertains, to the social, political and economic spheres, of a city].
Adagio
And while, like most, languages, human motion, can be used, as a, communications tool, human motion [in its static form e.g. stances, poses and the likes], can be used, as a symbol, of power itself. Language, as a form, of power, is not, often, associated, with expressivity itself, but with, symbols, of all sorts. Human motion, in its, symbolic form, as a communicator, of power, is often, associated, with what, they call, Primordial Symbols; symbols, often believed, to have been used, to create, the universe itself [the ability, to embody, these symbols, and express them, can very well, make one, similar, to the universal mind].
Traditionally though, the development, of Language, and Human motion itself, have often, contrasted, and differed, in a rather, interesting manner. Language itself, has often, developed, with regards, to what, they call, Signs [signs seen, and the attempt, to explain them]. These Signs, were often, in the form, of, emblems, emblematic, and insignia. Greek, as a language for instance, developed, via, the study, of ancient Signs [coming from Egypt], and the attempt, to explain, and very much, express, what they meant [emotions aroused] [the Egyptians, were rather advanced, in the study, of Signs]. Human motion, on the otherhand, while associated, with Language development, has also, very much, had a history, of its own [as with regards, to its development], and often, associated, with what, one could call, Sacred Languages [like Khoisan speech]. In many ways, this occurred, in the form, of, identifying, with a Primordial Symbol [attempting to embody it], and on doing so [usually, via expression, such as Dance], one would learn, how to express themselves, in a new way, and manner, resulting very much too, in a change of speech [Dances, such as those, associated, with Shiva, embody, Primordial Symbols, and belong to, Sacred Dance].
While the study, of Signs [emblems, emblematic and insignia], led, to the development, of Language [not only via, attempting to express them], but also, very much, in understanding, the principles, thoughts and practises, that these Signs, embodied, in themselves, and also, very much, expressed, via, the Human motion, induced. In all, while Language, is often, believed, at its heart, to be, structurally based, on the Noun-Verb construct, in reality, ancient Languages [more advanced than modern], were structurally based, on expressing, thoughts, principles, and practises. We too have though, what they call, Colloquial Languages, which are Languages, that arise, from the main study, of Human motion [as via Primordial Symbols], and being influenced, to speak, as one moves. Primordial Symbols, and Human motion, differ, in general, from motion, inspired, by Signs, in that, the Human motion, inspired [by Primordial Symbols], is problem solving, by nature; The fight scene, at the beginning, of the Musketeer movie, is one, of, Primordial Symbols, and their making, one act, in a way, to bring about, Balance, of all sorts. In many ways really, it is, Colloquial Languages, that are based, on, Noun-Verb constructs.
Language and Identity:
Language, in many ways, has often, been used, to forment, an Identity [of any kind], and especially, Group Identity. This, in many ways, is rather, problematic, and confusing, in nature, as it limits, the usage [and development], of Language itself, and fails, to understand, that, Language, is our primary tool, used, in helping us, evolve, into higher beings [they do not speak, English, in the heavens]. To make something confusing, rather clearer, is to attempt, to understand, the general, downfall, of man, from an evolving being, into, a hominidal one.
We can, in general, divide, the human, into, two, prime identities: Individual and Group. We can say too, that, Language, is used, to help us, evolve, with regards, to these, two identities. These two identities, are not, as simple, in description, as many believe them, to be; What this means, is that, most, believe them, to be, associated, with people [and one interactions with them]. This is not so, but was so, in the beginnings, of civilization.
In later periods, of civilization [going back, to the Ancient Egyptian times], Individual, and Group identities, were formented, in different ways, and as follows: Individual identity [with Signs and Primordial Symbols], and Group Identity [with Feminine law, Law, Art and Theosophy]. In general, the modern way, of creating, Identity, based on, Language, is very backwards, and people, since, the Egyptian times, have identified, with Signs & Symbols, and Group Identities, based on Art, Law etc., with Language, used simply, as a tool [of evolution] and communicator. In France, at one time, it was not, whether, you spoke, French, or not, it was, whether, you were, Baroque, or not.
In the world today though, while Language, is used, as an identifier [and Identity], with regards, to the Individual, the Group Identity, has taken, an even, bigger beating, with man made tools, being used, to replace, language, as a communicator [what this means, is that, most groups today, are not, held together, by a common language, but, by the tools, they use] [most human interactions today, are tool based]. The use, of tools, to forment, Group Identities, has very much, led, to a heavily, mechanized world. In past times, tools, had evolved, to the point, that, they were dictated, by, Feminine Law, Law, Art, and the likes. It is a strange world [of basic tools], we live in, tools, mainly used, for the purpose, of, ensuring survival [and not thought systems, or intelligence].
In todays world really, Individual Identity, while being, defined, by Language, is in most ways, created, by Body shapes & forms, and an accompanying, personal materiality. The study, of Body shapes & forms, has always, been, controversial, due to the, basic belief [very olden, and true, for ancient times], that all body shapes & forms, were the same in origin, and there was, very much, an ideal. In truth though, to really understand, body shapes & forms, is to understand, head shapes [for different kinds, of body shapes & forms, emanate, from different types, of head shapes] [in all, superiority, between, two different beings, is based, on their having, the same, head shape, and comparing, their body shapes & forms]. There are about, three, basic, head shapes [narrow, wide, and heart], and each, signifies, different things. Narrow head shapes, signifies, greater abilities, with regards, to, ones, evolutionary being; wide head shapes, mean, in general, one is more, religious/moral, by nature. Heart shaped heads, mean, in general, that one, is more, intelligent, by nature. What makes, any of them, superior, to the other [even within, the same group], is in, their having [and being], oval, in shape. In general, oval shaped heads [wide, narrow and heart, in scope], are superior, to those, that lack, any oval like influence [with regards especially, to the Godly being (the seat of creativity)]. You also, very much, have, the issue, of Negroid, and Caucasoid features, which are based, on the worship, of different, Deity beings i.e. deities and gods [Godheads]. People, with Caucasoid features, have often, worshiped, Deities, while those, with Negroid features, have often, worshiped, what they call, Godheads [e.g. being the Sphinx and the Meso-American gods (Olmec heads)]. Those who worshiped, the Godheads, lived, in general, more religious lives, while those, who worshiped, Deities, lived, secular lives. In general too, Godheads, are more, generally intelligent, than Deities, with regards, to basic intelligence [the ability, to generally understand, and grasp things, by nature]. Deities too, tend to have, specific intelligences, while Godheads, have greater abilities, with regards, to having, perspectives, points of view, and, objectivity.
Group Identities, today, on the otherhand, are more, or less, based, on regional identities [and associated tools]. Identities, such as, European, North American, African, Asian etc., are Identities, that are heavily, tool based [and survival based too], and generally state, that those, who identify, with such identities, tend, to use, certain tools, and in general, survive, in a certain manner. These, are the main, Group Identities, most have, and all others, are actually, based, on them.
Traditionally, the development, of Individual, and Group Identities, differed, as slightly explained, above. Individual Identities, for those, evolving, via Languages [and Signs and worshiping Deities too], were based, in many ways, on, Sporting Identities. One sees, the formation of this, mainly, in Ancient Greece, where, various, 'Olympic sports', such as, Javelin, and Discus throwing, were at the heart, of, forming, Individual Identities. Most 'Olympic Sports', are heavily, Sign based, with especial regards, to poses, and stances. Those who mainly, studied, Human motion [in forming Individual Identities & based, on Primordial Signs, and the worship, of Godheads], created individuals, mainly based, on, Sacred Dance [such as that, of Shiva].
Group Identities, as mentioned before, had evolved, to greater heights, and based on, Art [in past times]. Group Identity, is rather important, in nature, as it is the basis, of understanding, oneself, with regards, to history. What this means, is that, if one, has defects, based on, historical evolution, then, these defects, are not, really, individual, but group, in nature and form. In previous periods, Group evolution, as based, on, Art or Law, for instance, occurred, through, what they call, for example, Dynasties [as in the case, of the Egyptian Dynasties]. What these Dynasties meant, is that, they practised, a certain, form, of Law or Art. In many ways, Group Identity evolution, has regressed, to a rather, low level today, based on, basic survival tools [machines too], and their evolution. Understanding, Group Identity, is of prime importance, as many people, believing themselves, related, are not, really so [genetically speaking]. It is, for example known, that, Egyptians, and Nubians, differ/differed, genetically. The Egyptian-Nubian world, has given birth, to many, Art worlds: Egyptian, Greek, Ancient Spain, Celtic/Latin, Middle Eastern (Nubian-Phoenician), Nubian (Meroitic) and European. What is falsely assumed, is that, these worlds, are rather, much, the same, or similar, and all having, a basic root, in Egypt [this is not so]. The Egyptian world, including, all forms, of, Egyptian intelligence, only existed, in three worlds: Egypt, Celtic/Latin and Greece. The other worlds, said, to stem, from Egypt, actually, stemmed, from Nubia [in short, they are of, Nubian origins, and have no, relation, to Ancient Egypt (lower Egypt)] [the Nubian world here, is made up of, Upper Egypt, and Nubia itself]. Nubia, as a civilization, only did ever, equal, Egypt (lower Egypt), during the times, of, Akhenaten [and even earlier]. Many of these, more civilized, Nubians, actually became, a part, of the, Greek world. Why this is stated, is for many out there, to know, that, there has existed, a divide [genetic even], between, the Egyptian, and Nubian worlds, and that, what, most consider, to be, the Glories, of Ancient Egypt, were only, really associated, with Lower Egypt [and not, the Nubian world]. In general speech, a Mesopotamian, who was part, of the, Egyptian world, is much similar [in nature], to a descendant, of, Lower Egypt, than a Nubian is. The Nubian world, has proved, to be rather, problematic, and what, most consider, to be, of Beauty [even in America], of the Egyptian civilization, came, via, the Lower Egyptians [and Celtics/Latins]. The two most disturbing, of these worlds [Nubian], have been, Ancient Spain, and European. It is they, who have created, alot, and much, of the chaos, people see, in the world, today. America, has a part, ugly history, born, of, Ancient Spain. Theres, is a world [in the negative], heavily based, on defining, others, as being inferior, or superior, based on, elements, of hate really. A world, filled with, all sorts, of racial slurs [e.g. Coons, Niggers, Nigs, Oreos, Jambalayah, Cracker, Chinaman, Chinks, Hymie, Bean......], and many others, you probably, have never heard of. A world, in many ways, filled, with all kinds, of violence, and also, very much, associated, with the Spanish, speaking world. While the world, of Ancient Spain, has in many ways, had, unorganized violence, it is in, the European world, where, organized violence, becomes, common. Theirs too, is an ugly world, of all kinds, of, systematic like, forms, of discrimination [slavery, oppression, imperialism, colonialism, police brutality, racism, massacres/genocides, holocausts, wars, intolerance....], and all other such forms, of systematic based, violence. In short, what is been said here, is that, all that (above), is Nubia, and not, Egypt [what is been furthermore claimed here, is that, Egyptians (lower Egypt), are more or less, incapable, of such behaviour]. Why this is mentioned, is so that, for many, out there, to better gain, a better understanding, of the Western world, and America, specifically [as a Land of Beauty and Ugliness]. Those people out there, wishing, to develop, should realize, that their hopes, will never come true, via, attempting, to engage, the European, and Ancient Spain, worlds. They are worlds, filled, with all kinds, of hate [some genetic based]. The Europeans, in general, hate everyone, who is not, European. The Ancient Spain world [and even Spanish speaking], hate, brownskinned individuals, the most. For those, wishing, to develop, engaging, the Egyptian world, is the way, to go [as via, the Middle East] [they have the knowledge, the money, and Oil, comes with the package too] (in many ways, the Saudi Riyal, makes, for a better, world currency, than the dollar). In analyzing, the Western world, and other peoples, around the world, it is best, to analyze them [as a global community], based on, the Art worlds, that influenced them [and not continents] [India for instance, is home, to different, Egyptian-Nubian peoples; you have people, associated, with Ancient Egypt (Lower Egypt), Middle Eastern, and Nubian (Meroitic)] [Not all Indians, from Egypt-Nubia, are the same]. In all, what is been said, is that, most problems out there, are due, to the descendants, of, Ancient Nubia itself [minus some (dynasties really e.g. 12th and 18th)], and those also, strongly influenced, by this world [Ancient Nubia]. In many ways, it is the direct descandants, of the Nubian world, that are, the main problem here; Ray Stevenson, might be, of the European world, but he still is, very much, a Roman [in many ways, the very heights, of European Art, was attained, by the Romans, and not, the Europeans themselves]. The most ugliest too [in display really], of the Egyptian-Nubian worlds, has been, the Nubian (Meroitic) world. It has been, in many ways, a world, of poor Art, and all forms, of, disturbing violence [one is most likely, to be elbowed, and even gored, into, ones eye, while dancing, to Nubian music]. The Nubian world, is backwards, with regards, to, mainstream events [but looks progressive, since it is, very much, still, Art based, rather than, basic survival tools, tool based]. Nubian Art, gives rise, to, poor, and disturbing, mainstream events e.g. blindings, arm and foot amputations (via accidents of all sorts), poor timing, violent street fights, unplanned for pregnancies, and the likes. All mainstream events, that can, very much, become, part of your life, if you listen to, and dance to, Nubian music [it in general, influences, your behaviour, and movements, and one is likely, to have, an accident, from such, induced movements]. Beauty, in the Western world, really arises, from the, Celtic/Latin world [Celtica], which has, Egyptian, but mainly, Greek, elements [Johnny Depp (Egyptian), Alicia Silverstone (Egyptian), and William too (Greek)]. In all, as mentioned before, it is, Group history, that in many ways, defines, whom you are, as a Person, and how, you generally feel, about yourself (as a Person). [Hopefully, the Nubian (Meroitic) world, will be replaced, by, Niger Art, as it is a world {Nubian}, of never ending, problems, and as mentioned, very poor, mainstream events. No technology or science, can really resolve, the problems, of the, Nubian (Meroitic), world. For a good example, of the Niger World/Art, mainstream events, check out, the works, of Ugandan writer, Barbara Kimenye (Uganda, was once, culturally influenced, by Nigeria)] [Technological ingenuity, coming from, Nigeria, does not belong, to the Nubian world, but to the, Niger world] [Hopefully too, the European world, can be saved, by replacing its Art, with, Magick][even France, which is believed, to be, the center point, of European civilization, was not, fully, European, and had a, big, Egyptian element, to it (major figures, such as Dumas, worshiped, Godheads/the Sphinx)]. In all though, one should know, that, while, Ancient Egypt (Lower Egypt), was mainly Brown, it did have, Black, and Whites, in it; Nubia, on the otherhand, was mainly always, White and Black [the Egyptian Priesthood, which consisted, of, luminary figures, such as, Imhotep, also worshiped, Godheads/theSphinx].
Language & Evolution:
When talk, of Language, often erupts, it often, focuses, on which, is the best, and even, which, is superior, to others. In many ways, this talk, often, focuses, on grammar, and even, vocabulary [and sounds], issues. In many ways, knowing, which language, is superior, to another, is very much, based, on seeing, languages, from the perspective, of, adverbial descriptors; descriptors, which consists, of words, such as, tell, say, mention, state, announce, and the likes. Such words, and their various tenses too, such as, told, saying, mentioningly, and all the likes. These descriptors, in many ways, show, in just how, many ways, one, can speak, or say things. Whenever, one says, anything, in a language, they are basically, either, telling, saying, mentioning, stating [and all the likes], something. What makes, one language, superior, to any other, is how, many, of these, spoken states, it has, in comparison, to another language.
Most people today, simply, say things; spoken states, such as, mention, or state, are unknown, to most, out there. Even announce, is not, used, anymore [people simply, say things, even, when it appears, something great, has happened] [the world, is at a low, not conceived, since, the beginnings, of speech, as with regards, to the use, of only, say, in all forms, of speech, and writing, today] [Animal speech, also, often uses, say].
English, is often, considered, to be, a superior language, to others, when the truth is, that, the great minds, of Europe, were always, of, French, Italian and German origins. English, as a language, is great, for social evolution, and is only, superior, with regards, to, description [generally describing things]. One of the more, superior languages, out there, is Swahili [with regards, to spoken states]. Even French [old French], does not rise, to the level, of Swahili, with regards, to the heights, of spoken states [the known, greatest height, being, state]. It is possible, with Swahili, to hold, all kinds, of conversations, just simply, by, stating (state) things [not saying, mentioning, or even, telling]. Conversation, at the state level, is very much, ingenious, in nature [all this, refers, to Swahili, as spoken, by, the Swahili, and not, Kenyans, Ugandans or Tanzanians]. One should also know, that there are more, of these, spoken states, than those, labeled, using, only one word. While you have, spoken states, such as, tell, told, telling, or even, mention, you can also have, sayingly-tell, mentioningly-say, announcingly-mention, mentionably-announce, and even probably, sayingly-tell-say [the limits, of language, are pretty much, unknown].
Accessing, all possible, forms, of spoken states, allows one, to reveal, the ends, and limits, of the universe itself. Each of these states, is held really, by a logical structure [grammar], mainly consisting of, principles, thoughts, and practises. Which logical structure [that is, mainly, principles or practises], is of importance, depends, on how, one chooses, to live; in Africa for instance, one will find, that, while, many would believe, that principles, are of, great importance, one really finds, that, practises, are of more, importance. In Africa, survival, is really, by practises; what this means really, is that, for example, instead, of planning, ones day, by time [and space really], it is better, to plan it, by, clock [and appropriateness]. What this means, is that, in Africa for instance, one will find, that, doing certain things [including shopping for instance], is easier, at certain, time periods [with regards, to energy and feeling states], than at, others. Thats what practises, are mainly about [energy consumption], and that, doing certain things, at, a certain time period, is [feels], much easier, than at, other, time periods. In Africa, doing things, at 4 p.m., requires, less energy, than at, other, times [practise]. Also mentionable, even if, a language, is at, the say, level [as in sayingly], it can, still, develop, a considerable [and even interesting], culture, of its own. Old English, was at, the mention level, but the culture, created, was never, as interesting, as the culture, created, by Celtic/Latin Americanistas, based on, an American English, at the say level [sayingly]. Celtic/Latin Americanistas, once created, a most, interesting culture, of all kinds, based on, mainly, having, sayingly, spoken states. One of the offshoots, of this, culture, was an, amorous, love culture, based on, being, 'sayingly'. A culture, that was able, for instance, to deal, with colour differences, within them, by talking, in a sayingly, manner [the so believed, European culture, of dividing, white women for instance, by hair colour e.g. blonde, redhead, and brunette, is of, Celtic/Latin Americanista, origin]. An interesting culture, in that, it divided, people, by colour [in a sayingly manner], while making, everything, humane, in nature; And from this culture, developed, a love culture, that kind of, made, American women, rather popular, everywhere [the love culture, whereby, one returns, to their hotel, after, a hard days work, or even, after, a rock concert, and decides, to walk, into, a bar, wherein, they meet, the most, beautiful woman [often blonde], who decides, to engage them, in a, conversation, sayingly] [In such scenarios, anything, can happen, when things, are been said, sayingly (Am just saying......)]. One can also see, in many ways, how, the Art world, is never ending, in limits [with regards, to scope and nature], as a piece, of music, or a painting too, can be played/painted, in a, say, sayingly, tell, tellingly, mention, tellingly-say, manner [American Art, has in many ways (despite being interesting), only been, at, the tell level].
Language & Urban Planning:
Language, in many ways, when spoken, is often, really associated, with, intention, motive, and aim. Those three too, also, in many ways, are at the heart, of, human motion, itself. All this, is the basis, of, city and urban planning too [that there, is a language element, to it all]. Nearly all, urban and city planning, has to do, with, human intention, motive, and aim. Todays cities though, are heavily, not based, on the person (as they should be), but on, the car. Cars, in many ways, not only, define, how cities, are built [and urban planning in itself], but also, in many ways, define, human intention, aim, and motive. What is been said, is that, the walking being, has different aims, intentions, and motives, than the, driving being; and also that, the very act, of driving, eventually, has one, being driven, by certain intentions, aims, and motives. A complicated world, but not too, difficult, to see, for those, who have lived, in both worlds [as a walking being, and driving being].
What makes, urban planning [and city too], interesting, is that, peoples intentions, aims, and motives, can be thought out, in different, spoken states [tell, say, telling etc.]. In short, one finds then, that a community, whereby, peoples intentions, are driven, by, saying, results, in different cities [and urban planning], than communities, where, peoples intentions, are driven, by, mentioning. Paris, for instance, is a greater city, than London, in that, its a city, where, peoples intentions, have historically, been driven, by, mentioning [London, on the otherhand, has been, an announce city] [in many ways, intention, aim, and motive, pertains, to the social, political and economic spheres, of a city].
Adagio
