and the realm too even, of Political Instability in all.
- when most out there, tend to think of Political Instability, they tend to think about it in all, from even, the Victorian perspective in all again, of building rather functionable actually, Economic Models in all truly, or even truly again perhaps, the Anglo-Saxon model, of dealing with Political Instability in all, as it arises actually, and based on coming up, with all forms even, of interesting Political 'Ideologies' in all too really. These two ways of dealing with Political Instability [as with Bread shortages in ones neighbourhood even perhaps], does not in most ways, suit the rest of the World actually [as with the Victorian model in all, requiring truly even, Cultured individuals in all actually, to provide the ample needed solutions in all really] [and asking again, for those under it, to be rather cultured in all again, as with regards to meeting any form of change even] [and with the Anglo-Saxon model too, requiring all those under it in all again, to unite as Commoners actually (and not Citizens either as many are often falsely made to believe actually)] [and Commoners too, as with the Political 'Ideology' thought up in all, asking everyone (and without complaining too even), to play a suitable role in all (even if it requires one to be lowly paid, somewhat enslaved, or even asking one to donate money/finances in all, that one does not readily have available actually: as with even, taking out a loan, and lending it out to another in all really)] [In all, Political 'Ideology' even, asking for one to risk in all losing even, what they have truly worked hard to gain really, as with viewing even, the problems of a few, as the problems of the majority in all actually (and as with paying even, a 'welfare tax' in all too really)].
There is however, another more better way truly perhaps, of dealing with Political Instability in all [as with talk even, of riots in all too actually]. In many ways, it does speak of the Political History in all, of Egyptian Civilization in all too actually. For the Egyptians, Political Instability in all, was never dealt with via Economic models actually, or even Political 'Ideologies' truly, but in all ways truly even, via the defining in all, of Political Instability itself, as based around truly, defining in all again, whom was the Ideal/Perfect Egyptian citizen in all too really. On coming up with such a 'Prototype' (of the Ideal/Perfect Egyptian) [and as with Religion too even really], the cause in all, for Political Instability, could be well determined really, by asking in all again, whom this citizen was, as a Poor person (or a Person living in Poverty/'Spiritual Sickness' itself), and whom they were again, as Wealthy people in all actually [and as with this 'Prototype' citizen, speaking again, of the average daily Egyptian in all too actually].
On thinking on all this, Political Systems in all, were then designed truly [and as with flexibility too even], to allow for any Egyptian falling into Poverty, to live life in a certain way in all truly [and as with specific even, speak of, the kinds of problems in all, they did have to face actually], but yet still again, one does find that, Political Systems in all [and as with Fluidity too even], were designed in all again (and as Prototypes too even), for those attaining Wealth in all [and as with this truly all about, helping maintain, a certain level of Wealthiness to be seen and found, throughout Egypt in all actually]. In many ways perhaps, a better way to see all this is to say that, on Succeeding in all, most out there tend to see their Success in all again, from the perspective of Cultural benefits only, but never, from the perspective of Political Instability in all truly [i.e. keeping their Wealth intact in all actually]. On the otherhand, those falling into Poverty itself, could best be discerned in all again, from the perspective truly, of the Psychological/Sociological problems in all, they do face actually [and as with Political Systems in all again, designed to ensure, their survival with regards to this in all truly].
Having said all this is to state that, this model in all, is rather suitable for many a place/region out there, as with regards even, to the Decentralization aspect of it all [as with speaking even, of rather even, motivated Individuals in all actually], and allowing in all again, for many a region/place in all truly, to think of its Political problems, from a Family perspective even [or even truly again, from the perspective of the Individual in all too actually] [other than having even, UN sponsored Anglo-Saxon styled 'Ideologies' in all, ruining ones Business in all again (and as with the Global Economic Crisis too even), and where one in many ways even, has truly struggled, to make it all succeed (and as with talk even, of Minority Rights in all too actually)].
For Afrique though, the upper levels of Wealthy existence [and as with speak of Political Instability that is], in many ways truly in all, has paralleled often, 'Political Systems' Thought, similar in all, to that seen, in New Kingdom Egypt actually [and as with speak too even, of Osiris 'himself', and the Sphinx too even in all really]. The lower/base levels of existence in all [and as with uplifting the masses in poverty in all perhaps], has in many ways, always truly equaled, 'Political Systems' Thought [and as seen too even really, in Babylon Civilization actually (and as with Prostitution even, a recurring problem in all, within Afrique actually)]. In all again, 'Political Systems' Thought, that can in many ways truly, be employed in all even, by the Individual actually, and in helping them protect in all, their hard earned/garnered Wealth actually [and as with the case even, of Sovereignty (and the Tribe too in all too really)].
******************************
- when most out there, tend to think of Political Instability, they tend to think about it in all, from even, the Victorian perspective in all again, of building rather functionable actually, Economic Models in all truly, or even truly again perhaps, the Anglo-Saxon model, of dealing with Political Instability in all, as it arises actually, and based on coming up, with all forms even, of interesting Political 'Ideologies' in all too really. These two ways of dealing with Political Instability [as with Bread shortages in ones neighbourhood even perhaps], does not in most ways, suit the rest of the World actually [as with the Victorian model in all, requiring truly even, Cultured individuals in all actually, to provide the ample needed solutions in all really] [and asking again, for those under it, to be rather cultured in all again, as with regards to meeting any form of change even] [and with the Anglo-Saxon model too, requiring all those under it in all again, to unite as Commoners actually (and not Citizens either as many are often falsely made to believe actually)] [and Commoners too, as with the Political 'Ideology' thought up in all, asking everyone (and without complaining too even), to play a suitable role in all (even if it requires one to be lowly paid, somewhat enslaved, or even asking one to donate money/finances in all, that one does not readily have available actually: as with even, taking out a loan, and lending it out to another in all really)] [In all, Political 'Ideology' even, asking for one to risk in all losing even, what they have truly worked hard to gain really, as with viewing even, the problems of a few, as the problems of the majority in all actually (and as with paying even, a 'welfare tax' in all too really)].
There is however, another more better way truly perhaps, of dealing with Political Instability in all [as with talk even, of riots in all too actually]. In many ways, it does speak of the Political History in all, of Egyptian Civilization in all too actually. For the Egyptians, Political Instability in all, was never dealt with via Economic models actually, or even Political 'Ideologies' truly, but in all ways truly even, via the defining in all, of Political Instability itself, as based around truly, defining in all again, whom was the Ideal/Perfect Egyptian citizen in all too really. On coming up with such a 'Prototype' (of the Ideal/Perfect Egyptian) [and as with Religion too even really], the cause in all, for Political Instability, could be well determined really, by asking in all again, whom this citizen was, as a Poor person (or a Person living in Poverty/'Spiritual Sickness' itself), and whom they were again, as Wealthy people in all actually [and as with this 'Prototype' citizen, speaking again, of the average daily Egyptian in all too actually].
On thinking on all this, Political Systems in all, were then designed truly [and as with flexibility too even], to allow for any Egyptian falling into Poverty, to live life in a certain way in all truly [and as with specific even, speak of, the kinds of problems in all, they did have to face actually], but yet still again, one does find that, Political Systems in all [and as with Fluidity too even], were designed in all again (and as Prototypes too even), for those attaining Wealth in all [and as with this truly all about, helping maintain, a certain level of Wealthiness to be seen and found, throughout Egypt in all actually]. In many ways perhaps, a better way to see all this is to say that, on Succeeding in all, most out there tend to see their Success in all again, from the perspective of Cultural benefits only, but never, from the perspective of Political Instability in all truly [i.e. keeping their Wealth intact in all actually]. On the otherhand, those falling into Poverty itself, could best be discerned in all again, from the perspective truly, of the Psychological/Sociological problems in all, they do face actually [and as with Political Systems in all again, designed to ensure, their survival with regards to this in all truly].
Having said all this is to state that, this model in all, is rather suitable for many a place/region out there, as with regards even, to the Decentralization aspect of it all [as with speaking even, of rather even, motivated Individuals in all actually], and allowing in all again, for many a region/place in all truly, to think of its Political problems, from a Family perspective even [or even truly again, from the perspective of the Individual in all too actually] [other than having even, UN sponsored Anglo-Saxon styled 'Ideologies' in all, ruining ones Business in all again (and as with the Global Economic Crisis too even), and where one in many ways even, has truly struggled, to make it all succeed (and as with talk even, of Minority Rights in all too actually)].
For Afrique though, the upper levels of Wealthy existence [and as with speak of Political Instability that is], in many ways truly in all, has paralleled often, 'Political Systems' Thought, similar in all, to that seen, in New Kingdom Egypt actually [and as with speak too even, of Osiris 'himself', and the Sphinx too even in all really]. The lower/base levels of existence in all [and as with uplifting the masses in poverty in all perhaps], has in many ways, always truly equaled, 'Political Systems' Thought [and as seen too even really, in Babylon Civilization actually (and as with Prostitution even, a recurring problem in all, within Afrique actually)]. In all again, 'Political Systems' Thought, that can in many ways truly, be employed in all even, by the Individual actually, and in helping them protect in all, their hard earned/garnered Wealth actually [and as with the case even, of Sovereignty (and the Tribe too in all too really)].
******************************
Europe: A Political Trip
*
* base/lower levels of European existence, and as seen with European History in itself too actually.
