and Afrique.
the above work by Frances Hodgson Burnett, is in many ways truly, a re-writing even (and Arthurian Kenian too actually), of a rather famed Arthurian American work in all really: 'Little Lord Fauntleroy'. While in all too, general Evolution on this Earth really (and as with Religious Scholarship too actually), can be associated perhaps with the following: Materiality and North America, Philosophy/Thought and Europe, Persona and the Middle East, Status and India etc., in Afrique though, general Human Evolution in all has been rather too difficult even really, for many, to envision in all actually [with Egyptian Models truly even, more suited in all, for Africa itself, and rather than Afrique actually] [and speaking of general Evolution too, as with Religious Scholarship again in all really].
In Afrique though, general Evolution, and based highly even on 'Symbols' truly, has been, somewhat the norm actually [and 'Symbols' too perhaps, as not only with the Tribe in all even, but also, as with an example in all really, the 'German Celts' entry actually] [in Europe, these 'Symbols' were in all actually, Expressed really, and not Embodied in all actually (and one of the main differences in all between Afrique and Europe, and as with regards even really, to European Symbolism/culture in general too actually].
The problem though, with attempting in all actually too, to truly even, Embody anything in all really, is that, it can make one, even overtly, rather Sexual actually. It is this general culture too, of attempting to embody things in all (and highly seen too really, in the Victorian and 'Shiraz Arthurian' worlds even), that has actually, created, the very sexual environments in all really, that we today do live in [with Victorian Society, highly based around, embodying, the Ideals/Values, that Queen Victoria in all, did espouse really] [and again too, what did make the Victorian world, rather separate in all, from olden Europe (embodiment, versus expression in all actually)].
On the Politics of Sexuality:
Due in all, to the coming influence of the Victorians (and as seen around the World too even), many out there, have even, had, a phase shift really, with regards, to how they do in all actually, perceive Sexuality really. It was the Victorians (and popular literature in all even, and put out there by the 'Shiraz Arthurian' world actually) [and many today, published, under the banner of 'Oxford World Classics'], that did in all come, to popularize Sexuality/Sex, from the perspectives really, of the Figurative perhaps (and as with speak even, of an Ideal Sexual mate actually) [and the very world even too, of 'Kinds' of Sex/Sexuality (with the Victorians in all too actually, highly responsible in all, for popularizing, the Kama Sutra, and to the masses in all really)]. In many ways, speaking of 'Kinds' of Sex/Sexuality, speaks of, a rather even actually, high-profile World really, with Sex/Sexuality in all, offered to those only (and readily too), that Society in all, does deem, to be a Success, and of one kind or another really.
Before the world of 'Kinds' of Sex/Sexuality sprung up, most of the World (including Europe, and France too even), existed, in a World truly in all based around 'Forms' of Sex/Sexuality [and speaking too even, of Ethnography, and Information Networks especially] [in many ways truly, in the olden days, Men just simply tried to make themselves as attractive as possible (and all the time too even), and simply then waited (and as with Information Networks too even), to be told, of a Woman in all, seeking, sexual advances, from one in all actually really (and somewhat too in all, the very world even, of Sacred Sexuality actually) (and as with Women too really, being trained in all even perhaps, in this form of Sexuality/Sex, and from childhood too even)] [with 'Forms' of Sex/Sexuality in all too, truly reaching their heights perhaps, in both India and France too actually] [In all 'Forms' of Sex/Sexuality, espouses the belief, of male birds in all too, perceived really, as colourful and attractive even, and female birds in all too again, perceived in all actually, as colourless and 'sexual predators'/'home keepers' in all too really].
*In Italy, Sexuality/Sex, was actually too in all, of the 'Kinds' of Sexuality/Sex in all really, and with it all taking place though (and as with Cupid even), in the form really, of 'Figurative Play' (or Sexual Banter even actually), between, a Man and Woman in all too really [and with it all too, as with Cupid and Seduction even, Sex/Sexuality in all, lovetorn too actually, in its nature really (or even, Sexuality/Sex, as often portrayed today perhaps, in a Romantic Movie of a kind and such as even, 'Notting Hill' for example really)].
In all though, and as with a conclusion to all this actually, 'Little Lord Fauntleroy' (Burnett), does represent in all too really, not only a basic and archetypal even (and as embodied in all too actually), 'Symbol' based Persona really, but does actually in all too, represent, the basic Sexual Persona in all really, seen, within Afrique actually.
**as a further note though, and as with Domestication issues too actually really (which can be highly even, problematically aggrandized really, and within Afrique too that is) [and due in all actually, to Sex/Sexuality issues in all really], it is in many ways really too, recommended, that Charles Dicken's 'Bleak House' actually, be the foundational text in all, associated, with Domestication issues, in Afrique actually (and what in all too, does make Afrique, rather similar in all, to England/Brittania: Domestication that is) [with the works of Dickens (and by multiple authors too actually), written at a time, when change in all, could have been brought about, to England/London really (and drastic in nature too really) (and speaking culturally too in all that is, and not structurally), but today, are in all best perhaps, relegated even, to the role in all perhaps too really, of Domestication in all actually (i.e. Dickens, as a general read in all too actually) (but serving well too really, with regards in all, to Figurative Roles and Identities in all actually)] [most of Dickens works too really (and as with multiple authors even actually), have never in all, been made public actually (and as with publishing too really)].
the above work by Frances Hodgson Burnett, is in many ways truly, a re-writing even (and Arthurian Kenian too actually), of a rather famed Arthurian American work in all really: 'Little Lord Fauntleroy'. While in all too, general Evolution on this Earth really (and as with Religious Scholarship too actually), can be associated perhaps with the following: Materiality and North America, Philosophy/Thought and Europe, Persona and the Middle East, Status and India etc., in Afrique though, general Human Evolution in all has been rather too difficult even really, for many, to envision in all actually [with Egyptian Models truly even, more suited in all, for Africa itself, and rather than Afrique actually] [and speaking of general Evolution too, as with Religious Scholarship again in all really].
In Afrique though, general Evolution, and based highly even on 'Symbols' truly, has been, somewhat the norm actually [and 'Symbols' too perhaps, as not only with the Tribe in all even, but also, as with an example in all really, the 'German Celts' entry actually] [in Europe, these 'Symbols' were in all actually, Expressed really, and not Embodied in all actually (and one of the main differences in all between Afrique and Europe, and as with regards even really, to European Symbolism/culture in general too actually].
The problem though, with attempting in all actually too, to truly even, Embody anything in all really, is that, it can make one, even overtly, rather Sexual actually. It is this general culture too, of attempting to embody things in all (and highly seen too really, in the Victorian and 'Shiraz Arthurian' worlds even), that has actually, created, the very sexual environments in all really, that we today do live in [with Victorian Society, highly based around, embodying, the Ideals/Values, that Queen Victoria in all, did espouse really] [and again too, what did make the Victorian world, rather separate in all, from olden Europe (embodiment, versus expression in all actually)].
On the Politics of Sexuality:
Due in all, to the coming influence of the Victorians (and as seen around the World too even), many out there, have even, had, a phase shift really, with regards, to how they do in all actually, perceive Sexuality really. It was the Victorians (and popular literature in all even, and put out there by the 'Shiraz Arthurian' world actually) [and many today, published, under the banner of 'Oxford World Classics'], that did in all come, to popularize Sexuality/Sex, from the perspectives really, of the Figurative perhaps (and as with speak even, of an Ideal Sexual mate actually) [and the very world even too, of 'Kinds' of Sex/Sexuality (with the Victorians in all too actually, highly responsible in all, for popularizing, the Kama Sutra, and to the masses in all really)]. In many ways, speaking of 'Kinds' of Sex/Sexuality, speaks of, a rather even actually, high-profile World really, with Sex/Sexuality in all, offered to those only (and readily too), that Society in all, does deem, to be a Success, and of one kind or another really.
Before the world of 'Kinds' of Sex/Sexuality sprung up, most of the World (including Europe, and France too even), existed, in a World truly in all based around 'Forms' of Sex/Sexuality [and speaking too even, of Ethnography, and Information Networks especially] [in many ways truly, in the olden days, Men just simply tried to make themselves as attractive as possible (and all the time too even), and simply then waited (and as with Information Networks too even), to be told, of a Woman in all, seeking, sexual advances, from one in all actually really (and somewhat too in all, the very world even, of Sacred Sexuality actually) (and as with Women too really, being trained in all even perhaps, in this form of Sexuality/Sex, and from childhood too even)] [with 'Forms' of Sex/Sexuality in all too, truly reaching their heights perhaps, in both India and France too actually] [In all 'Forms' of Sex/Sexuality, espouses the belief, of male birds in all too, perceived really, as colourful and attractive even, and female birds in all too again, perceived in all actually, as colourless and 'sexual predators'/'home keepers' in all too really].
*In Italy, Sexuality/Sex, was actually too in all, of the 'Kinds' of Sexuality/Sex in all really, and with it all taking place though (and as with Cupid even), in the form really, of 'Figurative Play' (or Sexual Banter even actually), between, a Man and Woman in all too really [and with it all too, as with Cupid and Seduction even, Sex/Sexuality in all, lovetorn too actually, in its nature really (or even, Sexuality/Sex, as often portrayed today perhaps, in a Romantic Movie of a kind and such as even, 'Notting Hill' for example really)].
In all though, and as with a conclusion to all this actually, 'Little Lord Fauntleroy' (Burnett), does represent in all too really, not only a basic and archetypal even (and as embodied in all too actually), 'Symbol' based Persona really, but does actually in all too, represent, the basic Sexual Persona in all really, seen, within Afrique actually.
**as a further note though, and as with Domestication issues too actually really (which can be highly even, problematically aggrandized really, and within Afrique too that is) [and due in all actually, to Sex/Sexuality issues in all really], it is in many ways really too, recommended, that Charles Dicken's 'Bleak House' actually, be the foundational text in all, associated, with Domestication issues, in Afrique actually (and what in all too, does make Afrique, rather similar in all, to England/Brittania: Domestication that is) [with the works of Dickens (and by multiple authors too actually), written at a time, when change in all, could have been brought about, to England/London really (and drastic in nature too really) (and speaking culturally too in all that is, and not structurally), but today, are in all best perhaps, relegated even, to the role in all perhaps too really, of Domestication in all actually (i.e. Dickens, as a general read in all too actually) (but serving well too really, with regards in all, to Figurative Roles and Identities in all actually)] [most of Dickens works too really (and as with multiple authors even actually), have never in all, been made public actually (and as with publishing too really)].
